With our condensed history lesson in Classical Music vs. Popular Music: Where Music Parted Ways we discussed how and why Popular Music and Classical Music parted ways. Popular Music began to venture itself away from Classical Music in many forms including culture, notation, instrumentation, etc. However, in many ways these two entities are still actually very close and only have but a few things separating them. To expose the similarities we must also look into the differences.

One of the prominent factors that drives the wedge is the instruments or tools used to create each style of music. Classical Music primarily uses instruments that have been relatively unchanged for hundreds of years whereas Popular has electricity running through a majority of their instruments if it’s not synthesized already. What if you took Bach and played it on the Electric Guitar with some distortion on it? It could easily be mistaken as a 1980’s hair metal guitar riff if one didn’t know better.

On the flip side what if you took Popular Music to Classical Instruments?

Above all it’s interesting how much instrumentation effects the sound of a piece. But with these two basic examples it puts done one more thing that divides Popular Music and Classical Music.

Another factor is the notation of music itself. Most Classical Music is written out onto sheet music with details given tot he performer including mood, tempo, accents, etc. For Popular Music Notation usually just the chords are written out underneath the melody (typically the lead vocals). There tends to be a lot more flexibility given to the performer as well. Now obviously this seems to be a difference rather than a similarity. But let’s go back 400 years or more to the Baroque Era.

A form of notation used most often during the Baroque Era is called Figured Bass. As defined by Harnsberger’s Essential Dictionary of Music figured bass is “a bass part with numbers that indicate the intervals of harmony that are to be played above the bass note…” Which essentially translates to the Chord Progression being laid out; similar to Popular Sheet Music.

There seems to be a misconception with music lovers and in the music community that Classical Music and Popular Music are two entirely different beasts. To be fair, Classical Musicians tend to think of Popular Musicians as “lesser musicians” or “lesser composers” and Popular Musicians and Songwriters tend to think of Classical Musicians and Classical Composers as up-tight nazis who don’t understand what music is truly about. But who says they are truly different or have to be different? And at what point do we draw the line between the two?

According to Princeton the term “popular music” is defined as: “any genre of music having wide appeal (but usually only for a short time) “. This is a relatively vague definition but it puts it into perspective.

Music has been popular since man learned to bang a stick, blow into a horn or even sing before written history. It’s a form of expression and one of the most primitive forms at that. Music has developed the slowest compared to other fine arts, sometimes being a hundred years or more behind. The Musical Eras almost never line up with the Painting Eras. On the other hand it also generates more attention (generally speaking) than the other arts do. There are also two themes you will see consistently in the History of Music and (in essence) Popular Music: 1) That the music that is “popular” is either
forbidden or looked down upon 2) New forms of music are often originally created as a new form or a new way to dance.

The first solid form of documentation of music came from the Georgian Chants before the Renaissance. Originally these “songs” were developed as music for the church. There were only a few to begin with. However it became so popular that secular (non-religious) music began to change the words for these chants and also write their own. Later the church banned all but a select few of these chants; secular music was forbidden.

Later Nobles during the Renaissance would hire minstrels and the such to perform for them and their guests. Many times these musicians would play “dance music” for their guests to enjoy. Waltz, Ballads, Minutes and other Classical Music Forms originated as dances. These all became staples in Classical Music arsenal and further developed far beyond their original dance.

Jumping forward to the 20th Century we start to see where Classical Music and Popular Music actually start to really “divide”. In the early 1900’s Jazz starts taking it’s hold on America as both dance music and a forbidden music. After the World Wars America as a whole wanted a more similiar music, something they didn’t have to think about and the jitter-bugs were born. Now at this point Classical Music still had some pull. People were still going the opera and enjoying Classical Music Performances. It wasn’t old, it wasn’t
boring it was just what people did and enjoyed.

Then came the Serialist. The idea of Serial Music is a great concept… in theory. Serial Music deserves a whole post (or 5) to itself so I’ll summarize it. Basically these composers wanted to make music as organic as possible. There were basically 2 ways of doing this. The first idea was that any single note could not be repeated until the 11 others had been. This idea was to basically give every note an “equal” value. The other idea stemmed from the first but took it to the next level. They believed that music should be left to chance. To accomplish this “composers” would set parameters such as the length of the piece, the longest and shortest value of a note, the tempo and so on. They took all this information and plugged it into a computer. From there the it would play a game and spit out the piece of music.

Now I know you are thinking Computer =\= Music and I would tend to agree with you. But that is another wall of text.

Obviously the music these computers spewed out was either a) not easily performed b) sounded horrific c) a terrifying combination of the two. Not too soon after these “compositions” were published the public abanded classical music. There was little to no interest in classical music still (although it still had it’s place). Other forms of music began to take over its 400+ year reign and serialist crawled back under their rocks.

Serial Music has its place but it came at the wrong time and went too far. People wanted to listen to simple music then. They didn’t want to have to think about their music in the least. And they especially didn’t want to listen to something that didn’t sound “in-tune” to them. It went too far when Mathematicians, Archeticts and various other people decided they were Music Composers and that numbers would compose for them. It went too far when a computer almost single handily”composed” music. And it went especially too far when these “composers” called these things “music”.

Note that I did not say Serial Music killed Classical Music. I believe that Serial Music played a very important role in Classical Music. However, I draw the line where computers take out the process of composition.

Immediately after this the Classical Music community went in full reserve and Minimalism was born. However, it was not enough. Classical Music was “dead”. Lately it has been been emerging back into the mainstream ever so slowly. It’s gaining momentum and picking up the pace. I don’t believe it’ll ever be the sole source of music again. Nor do I believe it should be. But it will become and already is a large part of the music culture (however subtle).

The second part of this article will dive into how Classical Music and Popular Music really aren’t all that much different.

A week ago I was asked, “What is the difference between a musician and a classically trained musician?” For the life of me I couldn’t find a good, straight answer. It’s music…. maybe a different style but that knowledge could easily be transferred from one to the other. I learned how to play the classical guitar and have transferred that knowledge over to my electric. A pianist could do the same as with many wind instruments. Transferring the piano skills to keyboards or wind instruments to jazz and/or other genres.

After several days of contemplation I finally came up with an answer. Classically trained musicians learn music in a variety of ways. They typically have a better understanding of the “how” and “why” certain things in music work. In addition they learn to read written music as well as the ability to play off chords using a figured bass method. Many also go through extensive training to be able to hear chords and melodies and memorize them while either writing them down or playing them back on their instrument.

Generally Popular Musicians are self-taught or have some lessons here and there. There are a number of Popular Musicians who also learn to play by ear. The only difference is that it’s almost never formally trained. On a side note, that does not make it any less effective. It’s common to find a guitarist that reads only tabulator, a numerical system for playing the guitar. This only tells the person where to play but not how fast, for how long or any other form of communication.

Simple Answer: Classically trained musicians typically have a more indepth understanding of “how” and “why” music works. Also they have a wider range in what they can read/interrupt/reproduce music.

Music is unique among the arts. It captures emotions and feelings and connects people to a deeper level. People can connect with a photo or a movie faster, but rarely to the degree that music does. It connects deep in a person’s roots, identifying with them with an emotion unlike any other form of communication or expression.

Music is life.

It’s hard to believe that a collection of sounds rules/dictates/commands/predominates/controls/influences/alters/ our lives in such a way that it can make us feel, think and live. These feelings are taken for granted by most people and others believe that songs are written just for them. But what is it that attaches us to this organic form of communication?

For some music brings them back to a past time, a place they miss and long for. For others, it takes them to the future where they can be who they want to be. Music is raw emotion transformed into sound. Music is a simple and complex form of communication that is effective and moving.

To me? Music is a way to bring out love, anger, sadness and joy. Music is a way to bring out each and every array of raw emotion humanly possible. To some, music is a way to release these feelings that would otherwise be ignored.

What does music mean to you? Once you’ve figured out it effects on you and where it take you, you’ll know more about who you are and what music and life really means to you. So go out and listen to your favorite artist, composer and/or singer. Then expand your horizon. There’s much more out there than you can experience… If you’ll only listen.